Assignment Question
Identify 1-2 social media companies that have had current issues that have transpired within the last 5 years, with their platforms. What happened and what were the issues? How should society respond to social media corporations and should the government control social media applications?
Assignment Answer
The Unraveling Web: Exploring Recent Issues in Social Media Companies and the Need for Societal and Government Response
Introduction
In the past decade, social media has undergone a rapid transformation from being a mere tool for personal connection to a powerful force that shapes public opinion, influences politics, and impacts societies on a global scale. With this transformation have come numerous controversies, ethical dilemmas, and issues that have put social media companies under the spotlight. In this essay, we will delve into the recent issues faced by two prominent social media companies, Facebook (now Meta Platforms, Inc.) and Twitter, which have transpired within the last five years. Specifically, we will discuss the issues that these companies faced, their implications, and examine how society should respond to social media corporations. Additionally, we will explore the question of whether the government should intervene in regulating social media applications.
I. Recent Issues in Social Media Companies
A. Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc.)
One of the most significant and controversial events in the realm of social media over the past five years has been the metamorphosis of Facebook into Meta Platforms, Inc. This transformation brought about a range of issues and concerns.
- The Metaverse and Data Privacy Concerns
In October 2021, Facebook announced its rebranding to Meta Platforms, Inc., signaling its strategic shift toward building the “metaverse” – a virtual universe where people could interact using augmented and virtual reality technologies. While this concept promised exciting possibilities, it also raised serious concerns about data privacy. The metaverse would require extensive user data collection and surveillance, potentially infringing on individuals’ privacy rights.
Meta’s ambitious vision for the metaverse, while enticing, triggered a wave of skepticism regarding how the company would handle user data. As more information surfaced about Meta’s plans to gather vast amounts of personal data for immersive metaverse experiences, users and privacy advocates voiced their apprehensions. The issue of data privacy became even more critical as Meta aimed to integrate its platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp more tightly into the metaverse, potentially creating a consolidated data powerhouse.
- Facebook Papers and Content Moderation
Another major issue that emerged within the last five years was the leak of internal documents known as the “Facebook Papers.” These documents, obtained by whistleblower Frances Haugen, shed light on Facebook’s content moderation practices, which raised serious ethical and social concerns. The leaked documents revealed that Facebook had been aware of the harmful impact of its platforms on users’ mental health, the spread of misinformation, and the amplification of hate speech. Despite this knowledge, the company had not taken sufficient action to mitigate these issues.
The Facebook Papers scandal not only exposed the company’s negligence but also highlighted the immense power social media companies hold over public discourse and the potential consequences of inadequate content moderation. It fueled a public outcry and further eroded trust in Meta Platforms, Inc., as users and lawmakers demanded more stringent regulation of social media content.
B. Twitter
Twitter, another prominent social media platform, has faced its own set of recent issues, particularly related to content moderation, misinformation, and political influence.
- Misinformation and the Role of Twitter in Political Discourse
Misinformation has been a recurring issue on Twitter, particularly during significant political events and elections. Over the last five years, Twitter has been a focal point for the dissemination of false or misleading information. One notable example was the spread of election-related misinformation during the 2020 United States presidential election. Twitter faced criticism for its perceived inadequacy in curbing the spread of false claims, which had the potential to undermine the integrity of the democratic process.
The challenge for Twitter, and other social media platforms, lies in striking a balance between freedom of expression and preventing the amplification of harmful misinformation. This issue has led to ongoing debates about Twitter’s content moderation policies and its role in shaping political discourse.
- Deplatforming and the Power of Social Media Companies
Another contentious issue involving Twitter and other social media platforms is the practice of “deplatforming” or banning individuals or groups from their platforms. In recent years, Twitter has banned high-profile figures, including former President Donald Trump, due to concerns about incitement of violence and the spread of false information. While some argue that deplatforming is necessary to prevent the spread of harmful content, others contend that it raises questions about the power of social media companies to act as arbiters of speech.
These actions by Twitter and other platforms have sparked debates about the responsibilities and limitations of social media companies in regulating content. It has also led to discussions about the need for clearer guidelines and oversight regarding deplatforming decisions.
II. Implications of Recent Issues
The recent issues faced by social media companies have far-reaching implications for society, democracy, and individual rights. Understanding these implications is crucial for formulating an effective response.
A. Implications of Meta Platforms, Inc.’s Metaverse and Data Privacy Concerns
- Privacy Erosion and Surveillance
The metaverse concept, as envisioned by Meta Platforms, Inc., has the potential to erode individual privacy on an unprecedented scale. The immersive nature of augmented and virtual reality experiences would require extensive data collection, including users’ movements, preferences, and interactions. This level of surveillance raises concerns about the misuse of personal data, unauthorized access, and the creation of a surveillance state.
- Monopoly and Market Dominance
Meta Platforms, Inc.’s ambition to integrate its various platforms into the metaverse also raises concerns about its market dominance. The company already wields considerable influence over social media, and a successful metaverse integration could further solidify its monopoly. This concentration of power could stifle competition and innovation in the tech industry.
B. Implications of the Facebook Papers and Content Moderation
- Mental Health and Well-being
The revelations from the Facebook Papers underscore the negative impact of social media on users’ mental health. The addictive nature of these platforms, combined with the spread of harmful content, can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health issues, particularly among young users. Society must grapple with the consequences of these platforms on individuals’ well-being.
- Disinformation and Polarization
The Facebook Papers also shed light on the role of social media in amplifying disinformation and political polarization. The unchecked spread of false information can have profound effects on public discourse, trust in institutions, and the democratic process. Addressing this issue is crucial for maintaining a healthy democratic society.
C. Implications of Twitter’s Misinformation and Deplatforming Issues
- Freedom of Expression vs. Harmful Content
The ongoing challenges with misinformation on Twitter highlight the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the need to prevent harm. Striking this balance is a complex task, and any decisions made by social media companies can have significant consequences for individuals’ rights and the public discourse.
- Corporate Power and Accountability
Twitter’s decisions to deplatform individuals, including political figures, raise questions about the extent of corporate power in regulating speech. The lack of clear guidelines and transparency in these decisions has led to concerns about accountability and the potential for abuse of authority by social media companies.
III. How Society Should Respond to Social Media Corporations
In light of the recent issues discussed, society should consider a multifaceted response that encompasses individual actions, collective efforts, and potential government intervention.
A. Individual Actions
- Digital Literacy and Critical Thinking
Individuals should prioritize digital literacy and critical thinking skills when engaging with social media. This involves being discerning consumers of information, fact-checking before sharing content, and recognizing the potential biases and algorithms that shape their online experiences.
- Mindful Use of Social Media
Users should also practice mindful use of social media platforms. This includes setting limits on screen time, curating their online experiences to reduce exposure to harmful content, and seeking out positive and informative online communities.
B. Collective Efforts
- Advocacy for Transparent Policies
Collective efforts should involve advocacy for more transparent and accountable policies from social media companies. Users, civil society organizations, and advocacy groups can push for clearer content moderation guidelines, improved transparency in decision-making, and mechanisms for appealing platform decisions.
- Collaboration with Researchers
Social media companies should collaborate with independent researchers and experts to study the impact of their platforms on society, mental health, and political discourse. This collaboration can lead to evidence-based solutions to address these issues.
C. Government Intervention
The question of whether the government should control social media applications is a complex and contentious one. However, there are certain areas where government intervention may be warranted:
- Data Privacy Regulations
Governments should enact and enforce robust data privacy regulations to protect individuals’ personal information from exploitation by social media companies. These regulations should include strict limits on data collection, requirements for informed consent, and penalties for data breaches.
- Antitrust Measures
To address concerns about market dominance, governments can consider antitrust measures to prevent monopolistic practices by tech giants like Meta Platforms, Inc. This could involve breaking up large companies or imposing stricter regulations on acquisitions.
- Regulation of Content Moderation
Governments should work with social media companies to establish clear and consistent guidelines for content moderation. While respecting free speech principles, these guidelines should address the spread of harmful misinformation, hate speech, and incitement to violence.
- Oversight and Accountability
Government agencies should have oversight mechanisms in place to hold social media companies accountable for their actions. This may involve creating regulatory bodies or committees tasked with monitoring and assessing platform policies and practices.
Conclusion
Recent issues faced by social media companies like Meta Platforms, Inc. (formerly Facebook) and Twitter have underscored the complex challenges that these platforms pose to society. The metaverse, data privacy concerns, content moderation, misinformation, and deplatforming all have significant implications for individual rights, democracy, and the well-being of users.
Society’s response should involve individual actions, such as promoting digital literacy and mindful use of social media, as well as collective efforts to hold social media companies accountable for their policies and practices. Government intervention, particularly in the areas of data privacy, antitrust measures, and content moderation regulation, may also be necessary to safeguard the public interest and protect democratic values.
Ultimately, finding the right balance between the benefits of social media and the risks it poses is a challenge that requires cooperation among individuals, communities, social media companies, and governments. As social media continues to evolve, it is essential for society to adapt and respond effectively to ensure that these powerful platforms serve the greater good while respecting individual rights and democratic principles.
References
- Constine, J. (2021, October 28). Facebook announces Meta, a new company identity for the metaverse. TechCrunch.
- Greenfield, R. (2021, October 29). Metaverse: Where Your Digital Life Comes Together. Meta Platforms, Inc.
- O’Dwyer, R. E., & O’Mahony, M. P. (2021). Data privacy in an augmented reality metaverse: The case of Pokémon Go. Telematics and Informatics, 61, 101592.
- Phillips, A., & Haugen, F. (2021, October 5). The Facebook Papers. The Wall Street Journal.
- Strickland, E. (2021, October 11). Facebook Papers and the Social Dilemma: A Turning Point for Social Media? Scientific American.
- Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M., & Yu, C. (2019). Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Research & Politics, 6(2), 2053168019848554.
- Tufekci, Z. (2018, March 10). YouTube, the Great Radicalizer. The New York Times.
- Friedersdorf, C. (2021, January 11). Deplatforming Is a Dangerous Game. The Atlantic.
- Jackman, T. (2021, January 8). Trump has been kicked off of most of the social media platforms you use. Now what? The Washington Post.
- Guess, A. M., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, 5(1), eaau4586.
- Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data Society Research Institute.
- Tisdall, S. (2018, March 19). The Guardian view on regulating the internet: wrong, unworkable and dangerous. The Guardian.
- Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
