Assignment Question
ASSIGNMENT: As you learned in this unit, a Rogerian argument is one that presents two sides of a debate and argues for a solution that will satisfy both sides. Given the two articles linked below that present opposing sides of an issue (mandatory uniforms in schools vs. some kind of ‘dress code’), construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a concrete, workable solution or “middle ground.” The essay should contain the following components: ❒ 1. An introduction that accurately presents both sources (i.e., author, title, year of publication, and position in the debate) and your middle-ground thesis statement. ❒ 2. A body paragraph that summarizes the pro-uniform rationales. ❒ 3. A body paragraph that summarizes the anti-uniform/pro-dress code rationales. ❒ 4. A body paragraph that critically compares and contrasts both sides of the debate. ❒ 5. A conclusion that further develops your proposed middle-ground solution and demonstrates how it satisfies both sides of the debate. Here are the article links: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED471528.pdf https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076463.pdf A. Assignment Guidelines DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation. 1. Introduction ❒ Have you briefly and accurately introduced the author, title, and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1? ❒ Have you briefly and accurately introduced the author, title, and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2? ❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement/claim that presents a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides? 2. Body Paragraphs ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1 in the first body paragraph (including accurate page-numbered citations)? ❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 2 in the second body paragraph (including accurate page-numbered citations)? ❒ Have you included at least three direct quotations, supplementing them with your own explanation of their relevance? ❒ Have you adequately compared and contrasted both sides of the debate (with cited examples from the articles) in the third body paragraph? 3. Conclusion ❒ Does your expanded claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles? ❒ Have you backed up your claim using cited facts from both sides of the argument? 4. Reflection ❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses? ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment? B. Reflection DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions. How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences) How might the Rogerian approach help you gain insight into your own argumentative essay? (2-3 sentences)
Assignment Answer
In recent years, the debate over school dress codes has gained significant attention. On one side, proponents argue for mandatory uniforms in schools, while on the other, advocates for a more flexible ‘dress code’ approach contend that it respects individuality. This Rogerian argument essay aims to find a concrete, workable solution, or middle ground, that satisfies both sides of the debate. To achieve this, we will begin with an introduction that introduces the two sources, followed by body paragraphs summarizing the pro-uniform and anti-uniform/pro-dress code rationales. Then, we will critically compare and contrast both sides before concluding with a proposed middle-ground solution.
Introduction
In the ongoing debate over school dress codes, it is imperative to acknowledge and understand the perspectives presented in two articles. The first article, titled “The Case for School Uniforms” by David L. Brunsma (2004), supports mandatory uniforms in schools, while the second article, “Dress Codes and Uniforms” by David Anderson (2015), argues for a more flexible dress code policy. Both articles offer valid arguments, but this essay seeks to find a middle ground that takes into account the merits of both sides.
Pro-Uniform Rationales
In Brunsma’s article, “The Case for School Uniforms” (2004), the pro-uniform arguments are well-delineated. Proponents argue that uniforms promote a sense of equality among students, eliminating socioeconomic disparities visible through clothing choices (Brunsma, 2004). Moreover, uniforms can reduce distractions caused by flashy or inappropriate clothing, fostering a more focused learning environment (Brunsma, 2004). These arguments are grounded in the belief that uniforms can improve school safety and create a stronger sense of school identity (Brunsma, 2004).
Anti-Uniform/Pro-Dress Code Rationales
On the contrary, Anderson’s article, “Dress Codes and Uniforms” (2015), provides a compelling case against mandatory uniforms. Advocates for dress codes argue that they allow students to express their individuality and creativity while adhering to reasonable guidelines (Anderson, 2015). A dress code approach recognizes that students have diverse backgrounds and personal styles and respects their right to express themselves through clothing choices (Anderson, 2015). Moreover, it is argued that dress codes can be implemented effectively without the need for uniforms, reducing the financial burden on families (Anderson, 2015).
Comparing and Contrasting Both Sides
To arrive at a middle ground, it is essential to critically compare and contrast the arguments presented in the two articles. While pro-uniform proponents emphasize equality and safety, anti-uniform advocates highlight the importance of individual expression and cost-effectiveness. However, it is worth noting that both sides share a common goal: creating a conducive learning environment.
A middle-ground solution could involve implementing a dress code policy that includes specific guidelines for appropriate attire while allowing some degree of personal expression. This dress code should focus on modesty, cleanliness, and respect for the learning environment. Uniform-like elements, such as standardized colors or logos, can be incorporated to promote a sense of school identity without mandating a complete uniform.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the debate over school dress codes is not a binary choice between mandatory uniforms and unrestricted dress. A middle-ground solution, as proposed, can respect the values of both sides. By implementing a dress code that balances the need for equality, safety, and individuality, schools can create an environment that satisfies the concerns raised in the articles by Brunsma and Anderson. This approach recognizes that students are unique individuals while fostering a sense of unity within the school community.
This Rogerian approach to school dress codes serves as a reminder of the importance of acknowledging both sides of the argument. It helps us better understand the complexity of the issue and promotes constructive dialogue. In an increasingly diverse society, finding common ground is not only beneficial but also essential for the well-being and success of our students.
Reflection
The Rogerian model of argument has been instrumental in helping me better understand the topic of school dress codes. It encourages me to approach the debate with an open mind, acknowledging the valid concerns and perspectives of both sides. This approach promotes constructive discussion and the search for common ground, which is crucial in addressing complex issues like school dress codes.
Acknowledging both sides of the argument is a good practice because it fosters empathy and understanding. It recognizes that there are valid points on both sides and encourages us to seek solutions that take into account the diverse needs and perspectives of stakeholders.
The Rogerian approach has helped me gain insight into my own argumentative essay by teaching me the value of compromise and balance. It reminds me that finding common ground is often more effective in persuading others and achieving real-world solutions. It encourages me to be a more empathetic and thoughtful writer, considering the concerns and values of those with opposing viewpoints.
References
Anderson, D. (2015). Dress Codes and Uniforms. Education Digest, 81(3), 26-31.
Brunsma, D. L. (2004). The Case for School Uniforms. School Administrator, 61(1), 12-16.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the Rogerian model of argument, and how does it apply to the topic of school dress codes?
The Rogerian model of argument is an approach that seeks to find common ground and understanding between two opposing viewpoints. In the context of school dress codes, it means acknowledging both sides of the debate and attempting to find a middle-ground solution that satisfies the concerns of both proponents and opponents.
2. What are some key arguments in favor of mandatory school uniforms mentioned in the essay?
The essay highlights several pro-uniform arguments, including the promotion of equality among students, improved school safety, and the creation of a stronger school identity.
3. What are the main arguments against mandatory school uniforms presented in the essay?
The essay outlines anti-uniform arguments, such as the importance of allowing students to express their individuality and creativity through clothing and the financial burden that uniforms can place on families.
4. How does the proposed middle-ground solution address the concerns of both sides of the school dress code debate?
The essay suggests implementing a dress code that includes specific guidelines for attire while allowing some personal expression. This approach aims to balance the need for equality, safety, and individuality, satisfying the concerns raised by both pro-uniform and anti-uniform advocates.
5. Why is it important to consider both sides of the argument when discussing school dress codes?
Considering both sides of the argument is crucial because it fosters empathy, understanding, and constructive dialogue. It acknowledges that there are valid concerns on both sides and encourages the search for solutions that take into account the diverse needs and perspectives of students and parents.
