Differentiate between scholarly and non-scholarly articles. Describe and examine the scientific method.

Differentiate between scholarly and non-scholarly articles. Describe and examine the scientific method.

Differentiating Scholarly and Non-Scholarly Articles and Examining the Scientific Method

Introduction

In today’s information age, where knowledge is easily accessible through various sources, it is crucial to distinguish between scholarly and non-scholarly articles. This differentiation serves as a fundamental skill for anyone seeking accurate and reliable information. Scholarly articles are the backbone of academic research, providing a basis for expanding our understanding of various subjects. In contrast, non-scholarly articles often lack the rigor and credibility associated with scholarly work.

This essay aims to explore the differences between scholarly and non-scholarly articles and delve into the scientific method, a fundamental process used in scholarly research to produce valid and reliable results. We will examine the key characteristics that distinguish these two types of articles and provide a detailed overview of the scientific method, which is the cornerstone of scholarly research.

Distinguishing Scholarly and Non-Scholarly Articles

Scholarly Articles

Scholarly articles, also known as academic or peer-reviewed articles, are primary sources of information produced by experts and researchers in specific fields. These articles undergo a rigorous review process by other experts in the field before publication, ensuring their accuracy, validity, and credibility. Here are some key characteristics of scholarly articles:

1. Authorship: Scholarly articles are typically authored by experts, scholars, or researchers with extensive knowledge in the subject matter. These authors often hold advanced degrees, such as Ph.Ds, and are affiliated with academic institutions or research organizations.
2. Citations and References: Scholarly articles include a comprehensive list of citations and references that support their claims and findings. These citations connect the article to the broader academic discourse and allow readers to trace the sources of information.
3. Peer Review: Perhaps the most distinguishing feature of scholarly articles is the peer review process. Before publication, these articles are reviewed by experts in the same field who evaluate the research methods, data analysis, and conclusions. This rigorous evaluation ensures the quality and reliability of the work.
4. Methodology: Scholarly articles provide a detailed description of the research methodology employed, including data collection methods, experimental design, and statistical analyses. This transparency allows other researchers to replicate the study.
5. Length and Complexity: Scholarly articles are often longer and more complex than non-scholarly articles, as they aim to provide an in-depth analysis of a particular topic. They may include charts, graphs, tables, and other visual aids to present data.
6. Formal Language: Scholarly articles use formal and technical language specific to the field. They avoid colloquialisms and jargon that may be confusing to non-experts.
7. Abstract and Keywords: Scholarly articles begin with an abstract, which provides a concise summary of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. Keywords are also included to facilitate database searches.

Non-Scholarly Articles

Non-scholarly articles, on the other hand, are typically produced for a general audience and may lack the same level of rigor and expertise found in scholarly works. These articles serve various purposes, such as informing, entertaining, or persuading, but they may not adhere to the same standards of academic research. Here are some key characteristics of non-scholarly articles:

1. Authorship: Non-scholarly articles may be written by journalists, bloggers, hobbyists, or individuals without specialized expertise in the subject matter. The authors may not have academic credentials in the field they are discussing.
2. Citations and References: Non-scholarly articles may lack comprehensive citations and references, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of the information presented. If citations are included, they may be from non-academic sources.
3. Peer Review: Non-scholarly articles typically do not undergo a formal peer review process by experts in the field. Instead, they are often edited by editorial staff or reviewed by the publication’s editors.
4. Methodology: Non-scholarly articles may not provide detailed information about the research methods used, making it challenging to assess the validity of the claims made.
5. Length and Complexity: These articles are usually shorter and less complex than scholarly works, aiming to present information in a more digestible and accessible format for a general audience.
6. Language: Non-scholarly articles use language that is accessible to a broad audience, often avoiding technical jargon and complex terminology.
7. Purpose: Non-scholarly articles may have various purposes, such as providing news, opinion, entertainment, or personal experiences. They are not necessarily intended for academic or research purposes.

Now that we have distinguished between scholarly and non-scholarly articles, let’s delve into the scientific method, which is primarily used in scholarly research to ensure the validity and reliability of findings.

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a systematic approach to inquiry and problem-solving that forms the foundation of scientific research. It provides a structured framework for conducting experiments, making observations, and drawing conclusions based on empirical evidence. The scientific method is a critical aspect of scholarly research, as it ensures that research findings are credible, replicable, and trustworthy. Here are the key steps involved in the scientific method:

1. Observation and Question

The scientific process begins with observation. Researchers observe a phenomenon or ask a question about a specific aspect of the natural world. This observation or question serves as the starting point for scientific inquiry.

For example, a biologist may observe that a certain species of birds exhibits unusual mating behavior during a particular season and may question why this behavior occurs.

2. Hypothesis

Based on the initial observation or question, researchers formulate a hypothesis. A hypothesis is a testable, specific statement that proposes a potential explanation for the observed phenomenon. It represents an educated guess or prediction that can be tested through experimentation and observation.

Continuing with the example, the biologist might hypothesize that the unusual mating behavior in the bird species is related to changes in daylight hours during the mating season.

3. Experimentation

Once a hypothesis is formulated, researchers design and conduct experiments to test the hypothesis. Experiments involve manipulating one or more variables while keeping others constant to observe the effects. This controlled experimentation allows researchers to collect empirical data that can either support or refute the hypothesis.

In our example, the biologist might design an experiment where some birds are exposed to extended daylight hours, while others are not, and then observe their mating behavior.

4. Data Collection and Analysis

During the experiment, researchers collect data by making measurements, taking observations, or recording information related to the variables being studied. This data is then subjected to rigorous analysis, including statistical methods, to determine if there are significant patterns or trends.

In the bird mating behavior study, data might include the number of mating pairs observed, the duration of their mating rituals, and any other relevant behavioral data.

5. Conclusion and Interpretation

Based on the data analysis, researchers draw conclusions about whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. If the data supports the hypothesis, it suggests that the proposed explanation is valid. However, if the data contradicts the hypothesis, researchers may need to revise or develop a new hypothesis.

In our example, if the data shows that extended daylight hours correlate with increased mating behavior in the birds, it supports the hypothesis.

6. Communication

Once researchers have drawn conclusions from their experiments, they communicate their findings to the scientific community and the broader public. This communication typically takes the form of scholarly articles, conference presentations, or other scientific publications.

7. Replication and Peer Review

An essential aspect of the scientific method is the replication of experiments by other researchers. Replication allows for the verification of results and ensures that findings are not due to chance or bias. In scholarly research, peer review plays a critical role in this process, as other experts in the field evaluate the research methods and conclusions to ensure their validity and reliability.

Benefits of the Scientific Method

The scientific method offers several benefits in the realm of scholarly research:

1. Objectivity: The scientific method promotes objectivity by relying on empirical evidence rather than personal beliefs or opinions. This minimizes bias in research.
2. Reproducibility: Experiments conducted using the scientific method can be replicated by other researchers, increasing the confidence in the validity of the findings.
3. Accountability: Peer review ensures that research is subject to scrutiny by experts in the field, holding researchers accountable for the quality of their work.
4. Progression of Knowledge: The scientific method contributes to the progression of knowledge by building on existing research and refining our understanding of the natural world.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ability to differentiate between scholarly and non-scholarly articles is essential for individuals seeking reliable and credible information. Scholarly articles, characterized by their rigorous research methods, peer review process, and citations, are the gold standard for academic research. In contrast, non-scholarly articles serve different purposes and may not adhere to the same standards of accuracy and credibility.

Furthermore, the scientific method is a foundational process that underpins scholarly research, ensuring that findings are based on empirical evidence and subject to critical evaluation. This systematic approach to inquiry has led to countless discoveries and advancements in various fields, making it an indispensable tool for expanding our knowledge of the world.

In today’s information-rich environment, the ability to discern between scholarly and non-scholarly sources and to appreciate the value of the scientific method is crucial for informed decision-making, critical thinking, and the advancement of human knowledge.

References:

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.

Bordage, G. (2001). Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. Academic Medicine, 76(9), 889-896.

Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books.

Sagan, C. (1996). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. Ballantine Books.

Scientific Method Steps. (n.d.). Science Buddies.

Sherwood, S. (2020). The Little Red Hen is Dead: The Dark Side of Peer Review. Medscape.

Smith, D. R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182.

Thyer, B. A. (2017). Preparing manuscripts for publication in reputable peer-reviewed journals. Research on Social Work Practice, 27(6), 641-643.