1. “Since the original position presupposes an implausible conception of the self, it cannot successfully justify principles of justice.” Discuss.
2. Suppose Roger Federer, one of the best-paid athletes in the world, has earned his fortune exclusively through ticket sales at big tournaments. He has many fans and is an extremely talented tennis player. Does justice require Federer’s earnings to be taxed and the revenue redistributed to the worst off? If so, why? If not, why not?
3. What, if anything, does justice demand that we equalise?
4. What, if anything, is wrong with the family?
5. What is the scope of distributive justice?