After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > it will objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > and build toward a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > and build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > and build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well-organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout! After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it practical (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotes to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph)? If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > it will objectively report various view-points > provide factual evidence > quote experts > build toward a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout!After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it effective (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotations to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph). If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout!After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it effective (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotations to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph). If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > it will objectively report various view-points > provide factual evidence > quote experts > build toward a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout!After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it effective (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotations to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph). If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > it will objectively report various view-points > provide factual evidence > quote experts > build toward a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout!After reading “The Myth of Multitasking” by Christine Rosen, in paragraph form, address if / how well the author accomplished the following:
Opening: does the author use a hook to open the essay? If so, what it is, and how is it effective (or not)?
Defined terms: does Rosen clearly define her topic? What is it?
Need to investigate: is Rosen able to show the reader her topic should be investigated? If so, how?
Facts and details: does Rosen provide trustworthy facts and details about her topic? If so, name two of them.
Impact: is Rosen able to show the negative effects of the topic on people? If so, how?
Quotations: does Rosen use direct quotations to convey various perspectives? Are there both positive and negative? Give example (s).
Does Rosen establish ethos, pathos, or logos with readers? If so, how?
Does Rosen move towards a conclusion (before the last paragraph). If so, how / where?
What conclusion does Rosen reach?
Lastly: a well organized Investigative Report will open with a problem to be investigated > objectively report various viewpoints> provide factual evidence > quote experts > build a sensible conclusion. At the end of your review of Rosen’s article, address how well Rosen accomplished these tasks.
Make sure your entry follows the MLA layout!
