Despite the high-tech nature of Third Eye and a Space Force, are you surprised that ground forces are still conducting such a famil- iar and conventional missions against low-tech adversaries? Why or why not?

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Who is the supported unit and who is the supporting unit in this story? Is it possible that the Space Force could be the supported unit by ground forces in the future? Explain a scenario.
2. Despite the high-tech nature of Third Eye and a Space Force, are you surprised that ground forces are still conducting such a famil- iar and conventional missions against low-tech adversaries? Why or why not?
3. Are future battlefield leaders likely to trust technology such as Third Eye even if it potentially conflicts with what they are observing on the ground? What if the recommended actions do not make sense to us tactically but the algorithms suggest the likelihood of success is very high?
4. If a Space Force and satellites can easily observe ground move- ments and communicate in real time, does that improve or inhibit the ground commander’s ability to command and control forces? Is there a point where there is too much overwatch?
5. Would a Space Force enhance or inhibit distributed operations? Explain.