write an essay performing an in-depth review of Mayer et al. (2019) research article.
the essay should critique the chosen article’s sample size, sampling methods, research design, and methodology, is it randomized controlled trial, is it a double blinded study, etc. alongside their pros and cons associated.
as a guide to critique Mayer et al. (2019) article, you can use the CASP checklist (attached) which involves questions to evaluate the research article.
the essay should have 980 words in a form of academic writing style.
The main body of the assignment (approx. 850 words) should focus on critiquing the chosen article.
references should include their corresponding doi,
and the arguments should be supported with relevant citations.
1195680
13 hours ago
write an essay performing an in-depth review of Bento et al., (2020) research article.
the essay should critique the chosen article’s sample size, sampling methods,
research design, and methodology, is it randomized controlled trial, is it a double blinded study, etc. alongside their
pros and cons associated.
as a guide to critique Bento et al., (2019) article, you can use the CASP checklist
(attached) which involves questions to evaluate the research article.
the essay should have 980 words in a form of academic writing style.
The main body of the assignment (approx. 870 words) should focus on
reviewing the chosen article.
references should include their corresponding doi,
and the arguments should be supported with relevant citations.
Further to discuss and find literature to support essential argument points:
–
Title – is it clear or unclear? Why is it good to have a clear title? Does it do what it says it will?
Inclusion / exclusion criteria – is it too narrow? is it too broad? Are they strict? How does this impact the study?
Methodology – what kind of study is it? Is it an RCT? Is this good? If it’s not, what kind of study was it and does this
improve the representation of the study and results?
Randomisation – was the sample randomized? – how were the participants randomised into their groups? Is it fair?
Is there bias? What kind?
Sample size – is it good / bad? What sample size is needed?
Year / location of study – is it old now? Is it done in the UK and if not, does this represent the population? Can it be
replicated?
Sampling – how did they acquire their participants? Did you have to figure this out yourself? Any bias? What kind?
Participant drop-out rate?
what are the results of the study? do you agree with its conclusion?
