1.Using the definition of argumentation presented in this week’s material, tell us how you argue. Do you tend to follow the rules of ethical argumentation or do you become aggressive (or stay away from argumentation all together)? Is there anything you would change about how you argue?
2.Find and post an example of someone using either a type of faulty reasoning or faulty evidence. You can post a video link or a link to an article. Tell us what type of faulty reasoning or faulty evidence we should be looking for in what you post.
3.Discuss a negotiation of which you were a part that went badly from your perspective. Use the materials from this week to dissect why it went badly. What would you do differently, were you to do it again?
