Compare and contrast Chisholm’s foundationalist account of justification with Goldman’s reliable process account of justification by answering the following questions (answer each question separately) (50 Marks):
a. What distinguishes epistemic justification from moral or prudential justification? (5 marks)
b. Clarify the final definition that each author provides of epistemic justification. (10 marks)
c. How would Chisholm analyze the sentence: “I am appeared-to-whitely?” Why is this an instance of a self-justifying proposition? Explain. (10 marks)
d. Why does Goldman think that many traditional accounts of justification fail? Give an example. How does his account avoid this problem? (10 marks)
e. What is the generality problem and why is it a problem for Goldman’s account of justification? (5 marks)
f. Determine which account is better by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each account. Defend your view in detail. (10 marks)
