Write a Canadians whose only medical condition is a mental illness or disorder and who otherwise
Descriptive analysis:
Give the background of the problem. The SCC said the current laws about capacity and consent should apply. Yes the law did not agree with their decision. Why? Think about why the law did not allow persons with a mental disorder to have access to MAID. Now consider why they should permit this group to have access.
In terms of Rule Utilitarianism, there are norms in our society about respect for autonomy. The law permitting MAID does not allow persons with a mental disorder to have access. You will argue that the law should be changed or not changed based on your ethical reasons.
When you look at the fine print, a lot will depend on how you decide the suffering is unbearable and refractory.
The descriptive analysis will include what the SCC recommended, why the law was more restrictive and what the proposed law will allow.
