The module readings address exceptions to the ethical principles that we’ve discussed this semester. One of those that is quite common in the helping professions is the balance between client autonomy and mandated treatment. Is it ethical for a client to be mandated to participate in treatment against their wishes, or at a higher intensity than they would prefer? One example is the mandatory sentencing of clients to 26 weeks of treatment services in response to a DWI charge, which is commonplace in Maryland. Another example is problem-solving courts, like drug courts and mental health courts. In these situations, does it violate our ethical principles to compel clients into treatment to avoid negative consequences, like jail? Why or why not?
