SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY and ETHICS — The Elite (VIPs) vs. The Masses
Consider:
Who should a society support and champion
The Elite: the champions, the famous, the rich, the powerful, the people who get things done, who runs and change society (for better or worse)… In other words: the fittest (the 1%);
OR
The Masses: the common folks, the multitude, the profusion, the crowds, including the 51% of people in America on some sort of social relief…
This questions colors and valuates much of the decisions we make as a society; it is past time to identify where we as individuals stand.
This question is the root of:
Republicans vs. Democrats
Bourgeoisie vs. Proletariat
Capitalist vs Socialist
Haves vs. Have-Nots
“To be is to do”—Socrates.
“To do is to be”—Jean-Paul Sartre.
“Do be do be do”—Frank Sinatra.
(Had to put that in here)
Anyhow, here is the topic you will argue:
Inquiry: Should survival of the fittest be the law of the land?
Or should a society support the weak?
REQUIREMENTs:
1,000-2,500 words
MLA-Format
Bulleted-abstract
Cites and works cited
Researched and supported arguments
