Prompt: Compare and contrast Singers theory of moral standing with Regans. Explain their respective criteria for moral standing. How do their different criteria lead to different implications? In what ways are their views similar? Which one do you think better captures our moral obligations to non-human animals? And why?
Additional Notes:
– Organize your paper in a logical way. That means, for example, 1) make general claims before discussing the details, 2) explain key concepts before using them in an argument, 3) state the conclusion and then present the argument for it, etc.
– Remember to include in text citations
ex: blah blah blah (Singer, 173).
– Be sure to explain as thoroughly as possible (define any necessary terms, etc.). Try to use your own words. If you feel the need to quote, you must use quotation marks and cite the text you are quoting. Even if you are not quoting the author, you should cite it to support your claims.
– You do not need to do any outside research; just use the texts I have attached
– Please utilize a good amount of evidence, do not just include one quote and expand on that for the whole paper. Utilize multiple pieces of evidence (maybe at least 7?) in the texts I provided (paraphrase or quote, but always in text cite!) to thoroughly answer the prompt.
thank you i love you
