what this case (McDonald v. Chicago) was about (the issues the U.S. Supreme Court was asked to consider),
Two Protagonists – who supports the Court’s ruling that all governments cannot ban people’s right to own handguns at home and why,
Two Antagonists – who opposes the Court’s ruling that all governments cannot ban people’s right to own handguns at home and why.
NOTE: For protagonists and antagonists, DO NOT CONSIDER THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, the plaintiffs and defendants, attorneys, or any one directly involved/presented in the Supreme Court debates. Supporters and critics can be other attorneys, state officials, law enforcement leaders, civil libertarians, senators, congressional members, etc. Supporters and critics must be individuals – don’t generalize with groups.
where do you stand regarding this issue/Court case and why?
Key terms for library research: Different key terms will receive different search results. You can try key terms such as: “McDonald v. Chicago”, gun control, self defense (law), hand guns, right to bear arms, and/or other key words combinations for your search.
