If Berkeley’s claims about the nature of reality are correct, why is Locke’s distinction between primary and secondary qualities no longer necessary or even coherent?

Words: 127
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Read both of these passages
In 1-2 pages, double-spaced:

If Berkeley’s claims about the nature of reality are correct, why is Locke’s distinction between primary and secondary qualities no longer necessary or even coherent?

Be sure to briefly summarize primary and secondary qualities in order to frame Berkeley’s response to them.

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven