Read Bell v. Maryland CASE on Page 769 (3rd edition) or 849 (2nd edition) of the text or any source that explains what happened.
Did the Justices in the majority decision in this case allow “morals” to play a role in their decision making process? Why or why not? Support your position with examples from the case.
From the dissentswhich Justices emphasized morals and why?
Who would Dworkin and Hart agree withwhy do you think he would he agree with them instead of the other Justices? Explain each writers positions in relation to the case.
Remember to answer all of the questions above for full credit!
You should be using the Dworkin and Hart readings to work on this. You should use quotes from the text (the case and the readings on Dworkin and Hart) but remember to explain why you think that quote is relevantin other words dont just give me a quote from something I have already read to answer the question.
