Write a 1-2 page response with commentary, critique, and constructive criticism for improvement. -Must be a double spaced response paper that assesses your peer’s research. In a friendly way, address all of the following questions. Each question response should be ~1 paragraph. 1.) What does your peer do well in their paper? Be specific! Is it structure? Sourcing? Graphs? Organization? 2.) What could they improve? Think about thesis, sourcing, organization, etc. 3.) Does their thesis align with the content of the essay? Why or why not? If short, what could be added? If long, what could be cut?
