Reiman’s central claim is that so called “white collar’ crimes like Ponzi schemes and sloppy
workplace safety standards ought to be subject to criminal sanctions that are at least as strict as those
that presently face what we typically think of as crime incidents involung *one-on-one” direct
harms, like armed muggings and assaults.
Do you think Reman is right about this? ire an argument for your position Also, pay special
attention to the four arguments Reman considers and responds to in defense of the current legal
Order, in which street comes are treated far more severely. These arguments and Remans
responses a good place to start your thinking about thus issuc and Reiman’s responses might not be
fully adequate if Bo, sou miplit want to call citention to tris tact esther in crucism of Keunan’
position or as the start of a better defense of it).
Reiman gires a large mumber of examples of practices that arguably pose a greater risk to our
wel-being than does streer crure, despite being treated far less sererely Bur surelr his oterriet-is
not ezhaustre Can you think of amr other common social practices that also meets the follomine
o.coroitions:
piatstol sese a sreeteE ohcO ckE aTeraGE szEacanie Tel bepg tnan cioes Fteee- Crae SND
2n ss sot sresEed as EexezelH as as srEEe- carae Nar co roy thni sre suobla co a respose to tbes
Predictions On
712 Accessibilitr: Good to ge
D
