Write a Literature Review: Difference between financial and material rewards is not clearly defined. The meaning of psychological rewards is good. It is unclear why the models of motivation are discussed. Is one going to be used for the research? Organising the literature in terms of the model would be better. From the figure, the part played by theories of motivation is unclear. The relationship between section 2.3 and the model is clearer. 2- Research Methods Appropriate choices but not well explained and justified The different methods should be defined and justified. The research time frame could be better presented outlining the cross-sectional nature of the study. Limitations of the study could be better developed 3- Findings and Data Analysis Good analysis. However, the final sentence is unclear. It reads as if financial and psychological rewards improve, and so does the turnover intention. Also, it needs to develop by analyzing the data (writing content), because now it seems to be just a list of numbers, there is no flow of the content between the lines. 4- Discussion, Conclusion and Recommendations A) Some recommendations but not all are realistic, timely and cost-effective B) needs some effort to link back to psychological theories. c)Given the small numbers, the recommendation that she ends with is quote strong. “Therefore, the HR practitioners should design financial rewards that satisfy the employees to reduce turnover intentions and improve performance.” D) The importance of materials reward satisfaction is overstated because it was not significant in relation to turnover intentions. E) The strong rating concerning psychological rewards are the most striking finding. Why emphasise religion? There was little difference between Muslim and non-Muslim. In the literature review, it was stated that this factor was only relevant for low-income employees. However, it was the independent variable with the strongest correlation to turnover intentions. This should have been noted. Turnover intentions is the best section but the findings are overstated. F) Recommendations for practice are confusing because you mixes different types of rewards. Flexible working practices were not part of this research so it is difficult to understand the second recommendation. First and third recommendations are within the scope of the research.
