In this reading, we will see an absurd dystopia’s version of equality. Ethically, Vonnegut’s story paints a wide divide between the idea of homogeneity (or “sameness” and “uniformity”) and “true” equality.
Equality: The state of being equal in rights and opportunities.
Inequality: Lack of equality in opportunity or treatment; racism, sexism, any type of social discrimination where rights are withheld. Social or economic disparity: the growing inequality between rich and poor.
What Is Vonnegut’s Point?
Consider, what is the difference between “fair” and “unfair” competition?
Some may say that attempts at equality are absurd. There is no such thing as “fairness”; utopia does not exist and that people are naturally envious. How do you feel about these assertions?
The text suggest that we lose beauty, grace, and wisdom when we are all “equal”—but, remember, this is not a true definition of equality. This is “sameness.”
Do your analysis based on the following questions:
For unjust government, an ideal society is devoid of common sense. Is the government in this story developing anti-intellectualism for a reason?
What are handicaps? Who are the main characters and why are they important to the story?
In the story, we see the idea of monarchy; there is the emperor and dukes, etc.—so, everyone beneath this power structure are comparable to slaves? Does the Handicapper General have a handicap?
Vonnegut is not saying we should all be the “same.” Obviously he feels our individual talents and abilities are important. But, Vonnegut is saying that we should have “equality.” What does the term “equality” mean to you? It should not be the same Vonnegut’s absurdist version.
Is Harrison a hero? Does it matter? Will anyone remember his sacrifice?
Compare and contrast the short film version with the reading. How are they different?
