You may reference any/all of the readings attached. Be succinct, compelling and incisive. What is something interesting, peculiar or discrepant in comparing two or more of the readings? How does the noted difference matter? How does the difference or omission cause you to doubt the validity of one or more of the author’s argument(s)? DO NOT SUMMARIZE
THE READINGS We already know what they say. Tell us something new.
How does some difference between the readings affect the authors’ conclusions or your
interpretation of what the two (or more) readings imply? How does the difference or
omission cause you to doubt the validity of one or more of the author’s argument(s)?
How would you know if they are wrong or you are wrong? Write these documents expecting the reader to try and disagree with you. Be persuasive!
