Take-Home Case & Questions The questions pertain to the situation involving Boeing 737 MAX crashes and Boeing leadership`s response to the crisis. Alongside the documentary, here are four links to articles that you may find helpful in gaining further insights. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/10/business/boeing-737-employees-messages.html https://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-737max-idUSKBN1Z902N https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertzafft/2021/10/01/boeing-737-max-aftermath-the-big-fish-getaway/?sh=4054c2ab2ef7 https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/video-clip-boeing-737-max-crashes-fatal-design-flawdocumentary/ https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/former-boeing-737-max-chief-technical-pilot-indicted-fraud You should also seek to do further external research surrounding the organization and its handling of the crisis to support your analyses and rationales as part of answering the questions. Questions are equally weighted. You will be assessed on (1) the level of your grasp of theoretical content and (2) your mastery of this content as evidenced by its application to analyze the context and events at hand. To meet or exceed expectations when it comes to exhibiting a grasp of theoretical content, you should seek to clearly, accurately, and comprehensively discuss the premise of a relevant theory and/or model (making sure to address all its aspects/components). To meet or exceed expectations when it comes to exhibiting a mastery of theoretical content through the use of contextual analysis and examples, you should seek to offer a thorough and comprehensive analysis and discussion of key events that took place (making sure to flesh out concrete leader behaviours and environmental/situational characteristics). Moreover, the quality of writing and the professionalism with which you structure your paper and articulate your arguments is being considered as part of the assessment. 10 pages of double-spaced writing (12-point Times New Roman font). Title and references pages are not within the page limit. APA formatting applies. 1. Using the Model of Servant Leadership and focusing on Denis Muilenburg, discuss why and/or how a failure of servant leadership took place. When it comes to servant leader behaviours, you may choose to focus on just three – not all – behaviors of relevance. 2. Using the Model of Inclusive Leadership and focusing on Denis Muilenburg, discuss why and/or how a failure of inclusive leadership took place. When it comes to inclusive leader behaviours, you may choose to focus on just three – not all – behaviours of relevance. 3. Researchers (Walumba et al., 2008) have coined four key components of Authentic Leadership. Discuss whether and how Dennis Muilenburg exhibits and/or embodies each of the four components. Make sure you provide concrete examples through drawing on his actions and behaviours as a leader. 4. Drawing on the most relevant – not all – follower psychological factors that foster destructive leadership and five perspectives on followership, discuss Mark Forkner`s conduct. Make sure to explain how and/or what his conduct may have been guided by as a prominent and highlevel follower in the organization who was operating at the executive level within proximity to Muilenburg. 5. Using Kohlberg`s Stages of Moral Development, classify Dennis Muilenburg`s, David Calhoun`s, and Ali Bahrami`s stages and levels of morality. Make sure to provide a thorough rationale for your classifications.
