• Introductiono The nature of war is evolvingo Combined Approach / operational success (in relations to strategic and tactical level) definitions.o Operational Success is a combination of tactical victories in order to achieve a means of defeating Germany in a large scale that leads to strategic success.o Thesis: – Combined arms was a great enabler to operational success, but it was not the key factor that led the allies to victory. Other elements play a major role, such as GERMAN OPERATIONAL FAILURE .German critical vulnerabilities, morale, resource( manpower), lack of offensive spirit( inability to counter-attack). (With description of how the structure will be set to support the arguments) 400 words for the introduction.Main Body• How the Germens and the Allies develop the combined arms and what the problem was?• Ludendorff leadership (infantry focused) /it does not plan for the follow upo The level of integration in different arms within the Allied. (refer to doctrine)• Compare between Foch and Ludendorff (in a way which support the argument)• Acknowledged what are the problems and challenged which the Allies faced and overcome in implementing the Combined arms approaches (counter argument).• Highlight the Germans failure in the combined arms implementation• Allies’ ability to learned (doctrine) tempo to exploit the German OODA loop (Observation – Orientation- decision- Action)- innovation, commonality, unity of effort, interoperability.• Compare and contrast the German and the allies. (Different perspectives ending up with critical thinking supporting the arguments)• Battle of Hamel & (select another battel where combined approach was not applied)• The first truly modern battle / How the Allies where successful/ How John Monash apply the combined Approach?• Highlight the Germans failure in implementing Combined approach resulted in failure in Moral, resource(manpower), lack of offensive spirit (inability to counter-attack). Highlight the different perspectives• Conclusion.• summary of the essay + key issues + this essay has shown that… 400 words.Notes:- Signposting between paragraphs to better guide the reader.- Reflect the essence of the operational level of war and not produce narrative accounts of campaigns. As such, account for componency, situational variables and the competing challenges confronting practitioners as they navigated the operational environment. Demonstrate critical engagement with the concepts pertaining to the operational level of war, and not produce narrative accounts of campaigns.Comments from CustomerTO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE INTEGRATION OF ALL ARMS INTO A COMBINED APPROACH THE KEY TO OPERATIONAL SUCCESS IN 1918? this is the title Discipline: analysis
