Discuss the debate between scientific realism and anti-realism.
Notes: You don’t really mention much about scientific realism or anti-realism, so most of your paper isn’t well tailored to the assigned topic. You need to explain in detail those two views, and cover an argument in support of the view you think is right. The arguments at issue were covered in class (e.g., the no miracles argument, the underdetermination argument, the debate over the observable/unobservable distinction from Maxwell and Van Fraassen). Your paper doesn’t include one of those.
