What is the significance of these conversations when we consider whether this particular trial is fair and impartial? (hint: Some actions the United States took in World War II are the issue here…)

Question #1: ( Judgment at Nuremberg Act 1):
Judgment at Nuremberg
Act 2): Consider carefully the exchange between Gen. Merrin & Col.
Parker on pp 72-73. Contrast this exchange with the one between Rolfe
and Janning on pp 67-68.

What is the significance of these conversations when we consider
whether this particular trial is fair and impartial? (hint: Some actions
the United States took in World War II are the issue here…)

Question #2( 5-7 sentences): Discuss something
that has sparked your interest in the readings.