write a essay about how Woodworking, Scala, and Rae would view the Schiaparelli v. Duplicates (1959) landmark supreme court of Canada case based on their views. More information below.
All relevant readings/sources will be attached.
1. How do you think that Dworkin and Scalia would view the majoritys reasoning? If you think
they would reach the same conclusion, do you think that conclusion is correct? If you think
that they would reach different conclusions, which of them do you think is correct? In both
cases, support your argument with the kind of philosophical reasoning that youve seen in the
articles weve read so far. (800 words, 2/3 of the mark)
2. Given the way that Raz understands the rule of law, would he say that the rule of law was
upheld in this decision? Briefly defend your answer. (400 words, 1/3 of the mark)
