Is the review an essay organized around topics (as opposed to a string of annotations)? Explain.
Is the number of headings and subheadings adequate? Explain.
Is the tone of the review neutral and non-emotional? Explain.
Does the research question stated near the end of the review, do they flow logically from the material presented in the review? Explain.
Did the Literature Review convince you of the need for research on the topic? What was the gap the reviewers identify? Explain.
Overall, does the review provide a comprehensive, logically organized overview of the topic?
Explain.
Is the conclusion/discussion at the end of the review appropriate in light of the material covered
earlier? Explain.
Are there any obvious weaknesses in this review? Explain.