Unit 3 Discussion 1 – Study Review of Ethics
Unit 3 Discussion
Study Review of Ethics
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Discussion Question/Prompt
Locate a research study (2015 or later) on your topic of choice. Explore the research study and review the participants, procedures (methods section) of the article.
Describe the participant protections provided by the researchers for participants.
How were the participants selected? How might this impact ethical principles within the study?
Would the participants in this study be considered “vulnerable”? Why or why not?
Were participants subjected to any physical harm or discomfort or psychological distress as part of the study? What efforts did the researchers make to minimize harm and maximize good?
Does the report discuss steps that were taken to protect the privacy and confidentiality of study participant?
