Write a 600- to 700-word micro-essay in response to the following:
Thesis Statement: What is the films main argument? What are they advocating for, and why did they make the film?
Question 1: How does this film try to make its case or persuade you of its message?
For example, does it use emotional appeal, reasoning arguments or credibility challenges, documentary authority, alienation effect, symbolism, or a manipulated point of view? Give at least three specific examples and discuss whether each is persuasive and/or effective. Cite sources that may affirm the topics presented.
Question 2: What is this film leaving out?
What would have weakened their argument? What has been spun or ignored? Were there any falsehoods? Give at least three specific examples and discuss the implications of presenting biased/incomplete information. It is a given that this film leaves out plenty, so be analytical and determine if these omissions are important. Cite sources that may refute the topics presented.
Conclusion: What are your final thoughts?
How well does the film educate the audience about the benefits and challenges of the technology highlighted?
What is your overall opinion, and how did this film alter your opinions and/or worldviews?
Support your response with at least three reputable resources.
Movie Link:
