Create a paper in which you must include the following points:
– Describe both of the frameworks using terminology that relates directly to the frameworks
– Identify the pros and cons of each framework for solving ethical dilemmas in regard to the promotion of social justice
– Apply the frameworks in order to solve the provided ethical dilemma case
***IMPORTANT NOTE: Summarize how the common morality framework is used/implemented to solve the case. Use ONE side of the dilemma to identify harms and benefits, moral rule violations, beliefs of the person, and alternatives to moral rule violations as well as why the action/rule violation is publicly allowed. DO NOT include a detailed descriiption of all 10 morally relevant features for both sides of the dilemma. This paper is a 5 to 8 page paper! REMEMBER: The aim is to demonstrate your understanding of how the framework is used to solve an ethical dilemma.
-Describe how each framework aligns (or does not align) with the NASW Code of Ethics
-Describe how at least one practice issue is present in the ethical dilemma and demonstrate your understanding of the issue using course content. Pick at least one of the practice issues that we have discussed throughout the semester, including, but not limited to, professional social work practice, autonomy/self-determination, paternalism, cultural competence, bias, the duty to warn, and informed consent.
You are required to use a minimum of five scholarly sources for this paper: at least two sources for the common morality framework, at least two sources for the other framework you choose, and the NASW Code of Ethics.
PAPER REQUIREMENTS – You must follow these guidelines in your paper!
