Write an essay that conforms to the convey-analyze method you have been using throughout the term, synthesizing information that you have learned throughout the entire course. You will be judged specifically on how well you critically analyze the information and make judgements (950 – 1200 words).
Specifically
Imagine Deborah McGregor and Stephen Scharper are sitting at a caf, having a conversation on sustainability, environmental justice and in what manner we might see hope for our planetary future. You join them in their conversation. Apart from having learned much throughout the course from engaging with all the course readings, videos, and classes, you have also just watched one (1) of the videos below from List A below. So, you have much to contribute to the conversation.
List A:
Chatting about the Environment with Stephen Scharper redux
Chatting about the Environment with John Robinson
Chatting about the Environment with Seth Klein
Make sure to convey at least 1 key concept that each McGregor and Scharper would bring forth in their writings/videos (i.e. you will convey at least two concepts total: one raised by McGregor and one by Scharper); for example, Traditional Knowledge, Earth having agency, water as a relative, her macaroon model for humanity as being part of nature, and so on for McGregor, and radical intersubjectivity, the precautionary principle, dialectic contingency, anthropoharmonism, the practice-preparation-doing of love, the chain of courage, the integrative sustainability of our psyche, and so on for Scharper.
Record the above conversation among the three of you, being sure to convey authors’ thoughts or arguments accurately, analyzing the core of the discussion that ensued, remembering to define all terms (including hope, sustainability, etc).
