What is the Gettier argument that shows that justified true belief is not an adequate definition of knowledge?

Words: 164
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Based on the lectures and Nagels book chapter, explain in your own words:
(i) Why does knowledge need to be (at a minimum) justified true belief, and not simply true belief? (ii) What is the Gettier argument that shows that justified true belief is not an adequate definition of knowledge? (iii) Explain one attempt to overcome the Gettier argument, and the main objection to that attempt.

Note 1: do not cite the lectures or the lecture slides / mind map. Instead, cite
the relevant part of the assigned readings, or some secondary literature.

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven