Review Chapter 2 of Ruggiero (2015).
In Chapter 2 (pp. 23-24), Ruggiero (2015) argues that the majority can err on the basis of the sub-conclusion that at various times in history, majorities have supported outrageous deeds and provides at least 10 reasons why.
Express the actual argument given by providing the missing premises below:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
——————————————————————————————————————————–
11) Thus, at various times in history, majorities have supported outrageous deeds.
——————————————————————————————————————————–
12) Therefore, the majority can err.
5. Use the internet, a newspaper, or magazine sources to locate an appropriate example that presents an argument that appeals to the majority view. The example could be a cartoon, an article, or an advertisement.
6. Analyze the example you found by following the form provided in Section 3.1 in the Module 3 Introduction and Key Points, found in Module 3 Preparation.
7. Write out the basic (or general) form of the argument first, then your analysis.
8. In a summary paragraph, explain why the majority view does not determine what is ethical and what is not.
Thinking Critically About Ethical Issues, 9th Edition – 5 Year Option
By: Vincent Ruggiero
