The critique should address the following areas:
The research question posed in the article:
• The relevant psychological theory and methodology used.
• The legal problem that is being addressed.
• The main findings.
• A critique of the article. Consider the following:
o Was the methodology appropriate given their research question?
o What were the conclusion(s) and implication(s) of the study?
o Is there be a better way to do their study? If so, please explain and offer
suggestions.
• Your reflections of the article. Consider the following:
o Did you connect with the article? Why or why not?
o What did you learn from the research?
o How do you plan to apply what you learned in your career?
o Was there anything that you did not understand or agree with in your article? If so, please explain.
Each critique should be 6-8 pages and written in APA format. (Double space; Font should be
times New Roman, 12-pt; Margins should be 1 inch on all sides). Your heading should consist only of your name and the full citation of the article you have
chosen to critique.
The article I choose is Carlsmith, K. M., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1316–1324. https://doi-org.ez.lib.jjay.cuny.edu/10.1037/a0012165
