Read: Andrew Marantz, Why Facebook Cant Fix Itself, New Yorker, 2020 (13 pages). This article is important because it builds on some of the arguments made by Pariser. He argued, it’s possible to make a “more ethical” algorithm that “sprinkles” opposing viewpoints and expands our “feeds,” or whether human gatekeepers (editors/curators) are necessary for that. This article sheds doubt on both the algorithmic and the human solutions – but are you persuaded? Do: Please create a Rhetorical Summary and Response for the article above. Focus on the argument(s) that you find MOST interesting in the article (it doesn’t have to be THE major argument). But try spending more time on a response paragraph
