·
address the role of social class in the formation of the relationship between structural racism and the U.S. urban planning, activism and policymaking.The first section presents the main argument of the paper, summarizes its outline, and the way this outline supports your argument (i.e., a summary of your argumentation). (0.5 page)
· The second section presents the current state and history of the relationship between structural racism and U.S. urban planning, activism, and policymaking. You can extensively use your response papers in this section. In this section, you present not a detailed discussion about social class but an informed and targeted summary of the course material and our class discussions about the relationship between structural racism and U.S. urban planning, activism, and policymaking. (1.5 pages)
· The third section focuses on the main question: What kind of a role, you argue, does the class inequality/stratification play in the urbanization-racism nexus? How significant is the role of class inequality/stratification in this relationship? (2 pages)
· The last section discusses how the relationship between structural racism and the U.S. urban planning, activism, and policymaking would have evolved in the 20th century if the U.S. urban planning, activism, and policymaking succeeded in and/or were designed to effectively alleviating/alleviate (or eliminating/eliminate) the class inequality/stratification in the United States. (1 page)
Please use the sources listed!
