Summarize and evaluate the conclusion(s). Are they logically consistent or inconsistent with the evidence provided in the article? Is it consistent with what you learned in the textbook?
What have other scholars said about the issue? How are their findings consistent/inconsistent with those in the article?
Overall, what are your thoughts about the central argument, evidence, and conclusion presented and why? What do you think the author gets right and why? What do you think the author gets wrong and why?
